All insights

The first 90 days of an AI creative retainer: a 30-60-90 plan

A 30-60-90 day onboarding plan for a D2C brand starting an AI creative retainer. It covers what your team provides, what you receive and what to decide at each checkpoint.

Kevin Dosanjh
CMO, AI Vidia
Overhead view of a light oak table with a pinned three-month calendar above three stacks of sketched ad storyboards, a notebook and an amber glass bottle
On this page8 sections

What should the first 90 days of an AI creative retainer look like, and what does your own team have to put in? This guide sets out an AI creative onboarding 30 60 90 plan for established D2C and consumer brands that already test ads on Meta, TikTok and YouTube. It is written by AI Vidia, a performance creative studio, and it describes how we would run the first three months of our Performance Retainer. The short answer: month one fixes the product, the brand rules and the review routine; month two turns test results into better briefs; month three is where you decide, with evidence from your own ad account, whether the cadence is worth the fee.

The plan uses only the published terms of the retainer: EUR 8,500 a month for 40 finished videos, each up to 30 seconds, delivered in weekly 9:16 batches with a weekly testing log. It does not promise a result. Production is something we control. Performance is something you measure.

Before day one: what to have ready

Most slow starts are input problems, not production problems. A studio can only keep your product accurate if it sees the real product, and it can only write useful variations if it knows what you have already tested. Collect these before the kickoff:

  • Product references. Clean photos of every product in scope, including packaging, labels, scale and the details that must never change. Note anything that is easy to get wrong, such as a cap colour or a printed claim.
  • Approved claims. The product statements legal or compliance have already cleared, and the ones you cannot make.
  • Your current best ad. The ad your media buyer would call the control today, with the metric they judge it on.
  • Recent test history. Which angles, hooks and formats you have tried, and what you concluded. A rough list is enough.
  • One named reviewer and one backup. The person who can approve or reject a batch without a committee.
  • Handoff details. Where finished files go: your ad account, your DAM or a shared folder, and who on the media side receives them.

If you do not have a clear control ad or any test history yet, that is useful information. It usually means a smaller first step is the better choice. More on that below.

Days 1 to 30: lock the product and the review routine

The first week follows our published weekly process: a brief on day one covering brand, audience and the metric the test is judged on; style references and a shot list for you to approve on day two; the first variants for review on day three; your feedback applied on day five; and delivery into your ad accounts on day seven. After that the cycle repeats every week.

The goal of month one is not volume. It is agreement on three things you will rely on for the rest of the engagement:

  1. What the product must look like. A short list of accepted and rejected examples. If a generated bottle changes shape when a hand picks it up, that clip is rejected, and the reason is written down so it does not recur.
  2. What the brand must sound and look like. A style system tuned from your own hero imagery, so later batches start from approved references instead of a new interpretation each week.
  3. How review works. One reviewer, one consolidated round of feedback per batch, and explicit criteria. "More energy" is not a criterion. "Show the product in the first two seconds" is.

Expect the first batches to need the most feedback. That is the point of them. Every rejection with a clear reason makes the next brief shorter.

Checkpoint at day 30: Are the finished videos accurate enough to run without a second internal edit? Is your reviewer spending less time per batch than in week one? If product accuracy is still in question, fix that before adding more concepts.

Days 31 to 60: turn test results into the next brief

By the second month your media buyer should have results on the first batches from your own account. The retainer includes a weekly testing log and a sheet of the variants that performed best. The data comes from your account; our job is to turn it into the next brief.

This is where the difference between a concept and a cosmetic variation matters. Changing the background colour of a winning ad is a variation. Testing a new reason to buy, a different problem the product solves or a different kind of opening is a concept. A useful month two contains both, but it is the concepts that tell you something new. Our guide to building a creative testing matrix explains how to split a batch between them.

Practical habits for this phase:

  • Write one sentence per concept stating what it is meant to test, before it is produced.
  • Retire an angle after it has had a fair test, instead of producing more versions of it.
  • Keep a running list of product and brand rejections, and add it to the brief so it is not repeated.
  • Agree with your media buyer how long each batch runs before it is judged, so feedback arrives in time for the next brief.

Our brief template for AI ad production has a structure you can reuse each week.

Checkpoint at day 60: Can you name at least one thing you have learned about your customers that you did not know on day one? Are the briefs shorter and the rejections rarer? If every batch is still a new interpretation of the brand, the style system needs work before month three.

Need new ads?
Describe your product and what you want to test.
Send your brief

Days 61 to 90: decide whether the cadence is worth the fee

Month three is a decision month. You now have three months of production, a record of what was rejected and why, and results from your own account. That is enough to answer the question the retainer has to justify: does a steady supply of 40 finished videos a month let your team test more meaningful ideas than it could before, at a review workload it can sustain?

Three honest outcomes are possible:

  • Continue. The output is accurate, the review load is manageable and the tests are producing decisions your team acts on.
  • Adjust. The production works but the mix is wrong, for example too many variations of one winner and too few new concepts. Change the brief, not the vendor.
  • Stop. Your spend cannot absorb this many new ads, or your team does not have time to review them. More output will not fix either problem.

Judge the retainer on what you measured, not on the number of files delivered. Forty videos is a delivery commitment, not a performance result.

The 90-day plan at a glance

PhaseWhat your team providesWhat you receiveDecision at the checkpoint
Before day oneProduct references, approved claims, your control ad, test history, a named reviewerA kickoff brief and a list of open questionsIs a retainer the right first step, or is a smaller test better?
Days 1 to 30Approval of style references, one round of consolidated feedback per batchWeekly batches in 9:16, a style system tuned from your imagery, accepted and rejected examplesIs the product accurate enough to run without internal re-editing?
Days 31 to 60Results from your ad account, agreed test windowsWeekly testing log, best-variant sheet, briefs built on what you learnedAre tests producing new knowledge, or only cosmetic variations?
Days 61 to 90A review of three months of results and workloadContinued weekly batches and a record of what was testedContinue, adjust the mix, or stop

Warning signs that the plan is off track

  • Your reviewer is still rewriting the brief every week after the first month.
  • The same product error appears in more than one batch.
  • Finished videos sit unused because nobody on the media side has time to launch them.
  • Feedback arrives after the next batch is already in production.
  • Nobody can say what the last three batches were meant to test.

Each of these has a fix, but none of them is fixed by producing more. Raise them at the next weekly review.

Where a smaller first step fits

A retainer is built for brands that already run steady paid social tests and can use a weekly supply of new ads. If you are unsure, start smaller. Our Control Test costs EUR 2,000 once: we produce 10 variants against your current best ad, you run them in your own account for 14 days, and you judge them on one metric agreed up front. If the variants beat your control, the EUR 2,000 is credited against the first month of a Performance Retainer or Brand System. The pricing page lists every plan and what it includes.

AI production also has limits. When a demonstration must be exactly right, for example a mechanism, a fit or a texture customers will judge closely, filming the real product is often the better choice. A good onboarding plan names those cases early instead of forcing everything through one method. Our review framework for AI ads covers what to check before approval.

Next step

If you want to see whether this 90-day plan fits your brand, book a call and bring your current control ad and a list of what you have tested. We will tell you honestly whether a retainer, a Control Test or neither is the right place to start.

Frequently asked questions

01What does our team need to provide before an AI creative retainer starts?
Clear photos of every product in scope, the product claims you are allowed to make, your current best ad and the metric it is judged on, a list of what you have already tested, one named reviewer, and details of where finished files should be delivered.
02How much review time should we plan for in the first month?
Plan for the most review in the first weeks, because that is when product and brand rules are agreed. One reviewer giving one consolidated round of feedback per weekly batch keeps it manageable. Review time should fall as the list of accepted and rejected examples grows.
03When should we expect performance data?
Performance data comes from your own ad account once your media buyer has run the first batches. How long that takes depends on your spend and the test window you agree. The weekly testing log records those results and feeds them into the next brief.
04What if the retainer is not working after 90 days?
Look at why. If production is accurate but the mix is wrong, change the brief. If your spend cannot absorb 40 new videos a month or your team cannot review them, more output will not help, and stopping or starting with a smaller test is the honest choice.
05Is there a smaller way to start?
Yes. The Control Test costs EUR 2,000 once for 10 variants tested against your current best ad in your own account for 14 days, on one metric agreed up front. If the variants beat your control, the fee is credited against the first month of a Performance Retainer or Brand System.

Next step

Get a proposal for your next ads.

Tell us about your product, audience and ad production needs. We review your brief and reply with a proposed next step.

Send your brief

Read next